This is my personal genealogy hobby site. The data contained here has been gathered through 20 years of genealogy. Some of it is my research, much of it has been shared with me.

DISCLAIMER: This is my speculative data. I've verified very little of it. Use it for hints and pointers, but do your own research!

It costs me over $50 (US) a month to have this data on the web, so your support would be appreciated! If clicking on advertisments is not your thing, please consider a donation!

Rob Salzman
e-familytree.net
PO Box 25335
Beaverton, OR
97298-0335

sponsored links

This data changes often. If you've arrived from a search engine, it's could be that you don't see the information you were looking for. The current index for e-familytree.net can be found here. You can email me at genealogy at e-familytree.net for updates, removal requests, etc.

Family Sheet

HUSBAND
Name: Robert Rose Note Born: Abt 1594 at Elmswell, , Suffolk, England Married: Abt 1618 at London, , Middlesex County, England Died: 4 Apr 1665 at Branford, , New Haven, CT Other Spouses: Elizabeth Potter Parker
Elizabeth

WIFE
Name: Margery Everard Born: Abt 1594 at Elmswell, , Suffolk, England Died: Abt 1644 at Branford, , New Haven, CT Father: Thomas Gawdy Everard Esq. Mother: Agnes Mannock
CHILDREN
Name: Robert Rose Born: 1619 at London, , Middlesex County, England Died: 1683 Wife: Rebecca
Name: Elizabeth Rose Born: 1621 at Elmswell, , Suffolk, England Died: 22 Jul 1659 at Branford, , , CT Husband: Michael Taintor
Name: Mary Rose Born: 1623 Died:
Name: Samuel Rose Born: 1625 Died: 1698 Wife: Mary Tompkins
Name: Sarah Rose Born: 1627 Died:
Name: Daniel Rose Born: Abt 1631 at New Haven, , New Haven County, CT Died: Aft 1694 at Wethersfield, , , CT Wife: Elizabeth Goodrich
Name: Dorcas Rose Born: 1632 at Stratford, , , England Died: 1708 at Branford, , New Haven, CT Husband: Daniel Swaine
Name: Jonathan Rose Born: Abt 1634 at Wethersford, , , CT Died: 21 Aug 1684 at Branford, , New Haven, CT Wife: Delivered Charles
Name: Hannah Rose Born: Abt 1636 Died: Aft 1685 Husband: Benoni Frisbie
NOTES
1). Robert and Margery Rose came to America on the ship Fr a n c i s, arriving 30 April 1634 at Plymouth or Boston, Ma ss ac hu s etts. Here is a list of passengers on the ship THE FRANCIS 30 April 1634. Passenger s o f t h e Fr ancis of Ipswich, Mr. John Cutting, captain , bou nd f o r Ne w England landed at Plymouth or Boston , MA f rom t h e Pubi cRecord Office, Kew, Richmond, Sur rey TW9 4 DU, En gl and John Beetes aged 40 William Haulton 23 Nicholas Jenn i n g s 2 2 William Westwoode 28 and Bridgett his wife 32 , Jo h n L ea 1 3, Grace Newell 13 Cleeare Draper 30 Rober t Ros e 4 0 an d Mar gery his wife 40, John Rose 15, Rober t Ros e 15 , Eliza beth Rose 13, Mary Rose 11, Samuell Ros e 9, S ara h Rose 7 , Danyel l Rose 3, Darcas Rose 2 John B ernar d 36 a nd Mary h is wife 3 8, Fayth Newell 14, Henr y Hawar d 7 Will iam Freebo urne 40 an d Mary his wife 33 , Mary Fre ebourne 7 , Sarah Fre ebourne 2 ,John Aldburg h 14 Anthon y White 2 7 Edwawrd Bugb ye 40 an d Rebecca hi s wife 32, Sa rah Bugby e 4 Abraham Newe ll 50 an d Franci s his wife 40 , Abraham Ne well 8, John Newe ll 5, Isa ack e Newell 22 Jus t Houlding 2 3 see Note John P ease 27 , F ayth Clearke 15 , Robert Peas e 3, Darcas Greene 1 5 Ro bert Wi nge 60 and J udith his wif e 43 John Greene 27 Ro b ert Pease 2 7 Hugh Ma son 28 and Hes ter his wife 22 Rowla n d Stebing 40 a nd Sar ah his wife 43 , Thomas Stebing 14 , Sar ah Stebing 11 , Eli zabeth Stebin g 6, John Stebing 8 , Mary W inche 15 Thom a s Sherwood 48 an d Alice his wif e 47, Anna Sh erwood 14 , Ros e Sherwood 11 , Thomas Sherwo od 10, Rebecca S herwoo d 9 Thoma s King 19 J ohn Mapes 2 1 Mary Blosse 40, Ric har d Blosse 11 R obert Co e 38 and A nna his wife, John Co e 8 , Robert Coe 7, B enjami n Co e 5 Mary Onge 27 Thomas Bo yde n 21 Richard Wattli n 2 8 Jo hn Lyvermore 28 Richard Pep per 2 7 and Mary his wif e 3 0 , Mary Pepper 3 1 2, Stephe n Becket t 11 Richard Hould i n g 25 Judeth Garnett 26 Eliz abeth Hamo nd 47e limped , h e dro oled, he stuttered and wa s constantl y ill. Hi s fami ly memb ers mistook these phys ical debiliti es as r eflectiv e of ment al infirmity and ge nerally kept hi m ou t of the p ublic eye a san embarrassme nt. A sign of th i s familial di sdain is tha t he remaine d under guardians hip , like a woma n, even afte r he had re ached the age o f major ity. Suetoni us, in particu lar, pre serves comment s of Anton ia, his mot her, and Livia , hisg randmother, w hich are part icularly c ruel in their as sess ment of th e boy. From the sa me source , however, it emer g es that A ugustus suspected tha t ther e was more to this i d iot t han met the eye. Neverth eless , Claudius spent hi s ent ir echildhood and youth in al mos t complete seclusio n. Th e n ormal rites de passage of a n i mperial prince cam e an d wen t without official notice, a n d Claudius receive d n o summon s to public office or orde r s to command troo p s on the front iers.When he assumed t h e toga virilis , fo r instance, he wa s carried to the Capi to l in a litt er a t night the normal p rocedure was to b e le d into th e For um by one s father or gu ardian in ful l publi c view . Ho w he spent the voluminous fre e time of h is yout h i s reve aled by his later character h e read vora ciousl y . He bec ame a scholar of considerable abi lity an d comp ose d work s on all subjects in the liberal arts , esp ecia lly hi stor y he was the last person we know of wh o co ul d read Et ru scan. These skills, and the knowledge o f g o vernmenta l i nstitutions he acquired from studying hist o ry , were t o sta nd him in good stead when he came to po wer. It should not be forgotten that Claudius s wing of t h e f a m ily suffered terribly in the internal struggles f o r suc ce ss ion that racked the imperial house. His fath e r died o n c amp aign when Claudius was only one year ol d , and his b elov ed brother, Germanicus, succumbed unde r s uspicious ci rcums tance s in AD 19. His only other sib lin g to reach adu lthood , Livi lla, became involved wit h Seja nus and paid th e ultim ate pri ce in the wake of th e latte r s fall from gr ace in A D 31. Through all this t urmoil C laudius survived , primaril y throug h being ignor ed as a n embarrassment an d an idiot. Claudius s fortunes changed somewhat when his unstab l e n e p hew, Gaius Caligula , came to power in the spri n g o f 3 7 A. D. Gaius, it seems, liked to use his bookis h , frai l un cle a s the butt of cruel jokes and, in keepi n g with t his p atter nof behavior, promoted him to a suf fe ct consul ship o n 1 Ju ly 37 A.D. At 46 years of age, i t w as Claudiu s s fir st publ ic office. Despite this sort ie i nto publi c life, h e seeme d destined for a relativel y qui et and sec luded dota ge when , in January 41, event s overt ook him. Accession 24 25 January, 41 A.D. Arguably the most i m p o r tant period of Claudius s reign was its first few h ou r s . Th e events surrounding his accession are worthy o f d et ai led d escription, since they revealed much abou t th e tru e n atur eof the Augustan Principate. In the early afternoon of 24 January 41 A.D., the em p e r o r Gaius was attending a display of dancers in a the at e r n ea r the palace. Claudius was present. Shortly bef or e l unc h ti me, Claudius took his leave and the empero r de cide d th at he ,too, would adjourn for a bath. As Ga ius w as ma kin g his wa y down an isolated palace corrido r he wa s surr ound ed and cu t down by discontented member s of hi s own bo dygua rd. In th e aftermath of the assassi nation the fir st ope n murder o fa Roman emperor t here wa s widesprea d pani c and confusi on. The German ele ments o f the emperor s body guard, who wer e fiercely loy al to th eir chief, wen t on th e rampage and ki lled indis criminate ly. Soldiers o f the lar ger Praetorian Gu ard be gan lootin g the imperia l palace. Ac cording to the bes t known tradi tion, some Gua rdsmen foun d Claudius cowerin g b ehind a cu rtain and, on t he spot, the y declared hi m their e mpero r and carried hi m off to thei r camp. In t his story , aha pless Claudius fa lls into powe r entirel y as a resul t o f accident, and ver y much agains t his wi ll. It is not h a rd to see why, wit h its implicit t hem e of recusatio imp erii , it is the stor y of his accessi o n that Claudius him self fa vored. Vestige s, however, ca n b e traced of anothe r traditio n that paint s a somewha t diffe rent picture. I n this version , the Guar dsmen mee t in thei r camp and dis cuss the situatio n facin g them i n light of G aius s murde r. Their pleasant, c ity b ased t erms of militar y servic e were in jeopardy. The y nee de d an emperor. Fixin g thei r intentions on Claudius a s t h e only surviving matur e me mber of the Julio Claudian h o us e, they sent out a par t y of troops to find him and b ri n g him back to their cam p s o he could be acclaimed em pero r , which is what happen ed. I n this story, the eleva tion o f C laudius to the purp le wa s a purposeful plan o n the par t o f the soldiers, ev en if C laudius remain s a passive an d relu ctant partner i n the who le process. The possibility has to be entertained that Claud i u s w a s a far more active participant in his own elevat i o n tha n e ither of these traditions let on. There is ju s t r easo n to s uspect that he may even have been involv e d in p lanni ng th e murder of Gaius his departure fr o m the the ater m inute s before the assassination appear s a ltogethe r too for tuitou s. These possibilities, howev er , must rema in pure sp eculati on, since the ancient evi den ce offers no thing expli cit in t he wayof support fo r the m. On the oth er hand, w e can hardl y expect them to , give n the later pa ttern of ev ents. The wh ole issue o f Claudi us s possible i nvolvement i n the death o f Gaiu s and hi s own subsequent a cclamation b y the Praetori a n Guard mus t, therefore, remai n moot. Despite the circumstances that brought him there, th e h o u r s following Claudius s arrival at the Praetoria n Cam p a n d h is acceptance as emperor by the Senate ar e vita l one s f or t he history of the Principate. Event s could h ave ta ke n a very different course, but that th ey worke d out a s the y did sp eaks volumes as to how fa r seven dec ades o f the Au gustan Pr incipate had remove d Rome from th e possi bility o f a retur n to the so calle d free Republic. News of Gaius s death prompted a meeting of the Sena t e . I n itially, there was talk of declaring the Republi c r es tor e d and dispensing with emperors altogether. The n, h owe ver , v arious senators began proposing that the y be ch ose n a s th e next princeps. Debate was in progres s when n ew s reac hed t he senators that the Guard had mad e the dec isi on fo r them Claudius, the soldiers choice , was sitt in g in th e Praeto rian Camp. The main historic al difficul t y in wha t happene d nextis due to confusio n in Josephus s accoun t which i s the fullest . In on e version, the S en ate sen t two tribune s to the Camp t o demand that Claud iu s step do wn. Once in th e Camp, how ever, the tribunes w er e cowed b y the ardent supp ort fo rClaudius among the s old iers and i nstead requested t ha t he come to the Senat e t o be ratifie d as emperor. In Jo s ephus s alternate ver sion , however, He rod Agrippa is s ummon ed by the senator s an d employed as a n envoy betwee n the Cam p andthe Sena te. C learly, Josephu s is conveyi ng two tradit ions abou t thes e events, one Roma n featur ing the tribunes , th e other J ewish highlightin g the r ole of Herod Agrippa . Suetonius , naturally enough , fol lows the Roman tradit ion , asdoe s Dio in his main acc ou nt interestingly, th e latte r show s awareness of some p a rticipation on the pa rt of Hero d Ag rippa in a later pa ssag e. Regardless of how the negotiations were conducted, t h e S e n ate quickly realized it was powerless in the pres en c e o f se veral thousand armed men supporting Claudius s c an dida cy. T he impotence that the esteemed council ha d ex per ience d tim eand again when dealing with the mili tar y dyna sts o f the L ate Republic was once more reveale d t o all, a nd th e meetin g dissolved with the fate of th e Em pire lef t undec ided. Whe n the Senate met again late r tha t night i n the Te mple of Ju piter Victor, it foun d its nu mbers muc h depleted , since man y had fled the ci ty to the ir countr y estates. T he senator s assessed thei r militar y strength they had thr ee or fou r urban cohor ts under t he comman d of the City Pre fect, numb ering per haps 3, 00 0 men. Wit h these, they occupi ed the Foru m an d Palatine . Plans wer e laid to arm some ex slaves to p r ovide reinf orcements. B y these actions the sen ators we re ac ceptin g that suprem e power in post Augustan R ome c ould be a chi eved only by m ilitary force all questio n s of legal nic e ties were irrel evant. But the Senate co ul d not contro l thei r troops t hey all deserted to th e Pra etorian Gu ard, wit h whom the y shared the Camp. Now completely powerless, the senators hurried o f f t o t h e Praetorian Camp to pay their respects to Clau di us . O n 2 5 January 41 A.D. Claudius was formally inves te d wi th a ll t he powers of the princeps, becoming Ti. C lau diu s Caesa r Aug ustus Germanicus. Since Claudius ha d n o lega l clai m to i t whatsoever, the appearance of C aesa r in h is impe rial na me marks the first step in thi s wor d s tran smutatio n fro m a family name to a title de notin g ruler, a nd so beg in s a tradition that stretche s into t he modern e ra with K ais er, Czar, and possib ly Shah. These events have been treated in some detail beca u s e o f t heir immense historical importance. Gaius was t h e f irs t emp eror of Rome to be openly murdered, and Cla ud ius s ac cessio n marks the first overt and large scal e in trusi on o f the military into post Augustan politics . Th e basi c fac t of the P rincipate, which had always be en im plici t in th e Augustan s ettlement but heretofore c areful ly dis guised , was now mad e plain the emperor s p ositio n ultima tely re sted not on co nsensus but on the s words o f the sol diers wh o paid him homa ge. From one per spective , the Prin cipate ha d been reveale d for what i t truly wa s an exer cise in ma naging the mili tary s l oyalties, a nd not a for m of governm ent rooted in la wan d consensus . The Senate , in attemptin g to block Claudi u s with troop s of their ow n, had acquiesc ed in this str uctur e of powe r. For ever af terward, emperor s sat on th e thron e on th e sufferance o f the troops they c ommanded , and a los so f army loyalty n ecessarily entaile d a los s of power, us u ally accompanie d by the loss of th e incu mbent s life. B ut t he harder les sons in these realit ie s lay in the futu re fo r the momen t order had been rest o red, and Claudiu s embarke don his r eign in relative se curi ty. The Early Years Britain, Freedmen, and Messali n a A D 4 1 48 Among Claudius s first acts was the app re hens io n an d execution of Gaius s assassins. Whateve r hi s opin io n of t heir actions, politics and pietas req uire d that C lau dius no t be seen to condone men who murd ere d an empero r an d a memb er of his own family. He als o dis played immed iat e understan ding of the centrality o f th e military to h is p osition an d sought to create a m ilita ry image for him sel f that his pr iorsheltered exis tenc e had denied him. P repa rations got un der way soon a fte r his accession fo r a majo r military exped ition int o Bri tain, perhaps spark ed by a n attempted revol t of th e gove rnor of Dalmatia, L . Arrunti us Camillus Scribo nia nus, i n 42 A.D.. The invasi on itself , spearheaded by fo u r legi ons, commenced in th e summer o f 43 and was to la st fo r d ecades, ultimately fa lling shor t of the annexat ion of t h e whole island if ind eed that wa s Claudius s final obj ecti veat the outset . T his move mar ked th e first majo r additio n to the territor y of the Roma n em pire since th e reign of A ugustus. Claudi us himself to o k part in the c ampaign, arrivi ng in the wa r zone wit h an e ntourage of e x consuls in the l ate summe r of 43 A .D. Afte r a parade a t Camulodunum Colche ster t o impre ss the nati ves, he re turned to Rome to celebr at e a triu mph in 44 A.D . His mil itary credentials had be e n firml y established. The sources are united in portraying Claudius a s a d u p e t o his imperial freedmen advisors as well as t o hi s wi ve s. I t is possible that the hostile stance o f the e lit e tow ard C laudius extended back into his reig n h e was , afte r all , ausurper who had been foiste d on th e aristo crats b y th e soldiers. If so, Claudius s relianc e on hi s freedme n ma y have stemmed from this c ircumstanc e, in th at the ex slave s were as far as he w as concerne d more t rustworth y than t he sullen aristocr acy. For wha tever reas ons, ther e is no do ubt that Claud ius s reign i s the firs t era of th e great imp erial free dman. To be su re, the sec retariat ha d existed bef ore Cl audius and memb ers of it ha d achieved s ome prominenc e notably Helico n and Callistu s under Gaius , but the ri s e of powerful i ndividuals lik e Narcissus, Pol ybius, an d Pal las was a di stinctive mar k of Claudius s rei gn. Th e power o f these m en was demonst rated early on whe n th e emperor chos e Narc issus as his en voy to the legion s a s they hesitated t o e mbark on their i nvasion of Britai n . According to our so u rces, the freedme n were frequent ly t o exert less benefi cen t influences thr oughout Claud ius s r eign. In 38 A.D. Claudius had married Valeria Messalina , a s c i o n of a noble house with impressive familial con nectio n s . Me ssalina bore him a daughter Octavia, bor n in 39 a n d a so n Britannicus, born in 41 she was t herefor e th e m other o fthe heir apparent and enjoyed in fluenc e for t ha t reason . In the sources, Messalina is p ortraye d as lit tl e more tha n a pouting adolescent nymph omania c who hold s wi ld partie s and arranges the death s of form er lovers o r tho se who sco rn her advances an d all thi s while her cu ckolde d husband b lunders on in b lissful ig norance. Recent ly, att empts have b een made t o rehabilita te Messalina a s an astut e player of c ourt p olitics who u sed sex as a we apon, but i n the end we h av elittle way o f knowing the tr uth. What w e can say is th a t either he r love of parties on the adole scent model or h er byzan tine scheming on th e able courti er model brough t her d own. While Claudius w as away in Ost ia i n AD 48, Mess alina had a party in the p alace in the co u rse of which a ma r riage ceremony was perf ormed or playa c ted between herse l f and a consul designa te, C. Silius . Wh atever the inten tion s behind it, the pol itical rami ficatio ns of this fol ly wer e sufficiently grav e to caus e the summ ary executio n of Mess alina, Silius, an d assor ted hangers o n orchest rated, telli ngly, by the fr eedma n Narcissus . Cl audius w as now withou t a wife. The Rise of Agrippina and Claudius s Death 48 54 A . D . I n our sources, the death of Messalina is present e d a s i niti ating a scramble among the freedmen, each wi sh in g to p lac e his preferred candidate at Claudius s si d e a s the ne w emp ress. In the end, it was Pallas who pr ev aile d when h e convi nced Claudius to marry Agrippina t h e Young er. The m arriag e took place within months of Me ss alina s execution . Agripp ina was a colorful figure wi t h extensi ve and far r eaching i mperial connections sh e w as the dau ghter of Clau dius s bro ther, Germanicus, a n d a sister o f Gaius Caligula , by whom s he had been exi le d for involve ment in the consp iracy of Gae tulicus mo reo ver, she had b een married before . She therefo rebrou gh t to the marriag e with Claudius w hich necessita t e d a change in the la w to allow uncles to m arry their br o t hers daughters a son, L. Domitius Aheno barbus. Ag ri ppin a s ambitions f or this son proved the undo ing o f Cla udius. The years between his marriage to Agrippina in 4 8 a n d h i s death in 54 were difficult ones for Claudius . Whe th e r o r not sources are right to portray him a s a dupe o f h i s wiv es and freedmen throughout his reign , there ca n b e li ttle d oubtthat Agrippina s powerful p ersonalit y domi nate d Claudi us s last years. Her positio n, openl y influen tia l in a mann er unlike any previous e mpress, w as recogni ze d by those att uned to imperial pol itics, an d she appear s m ore and more pr ominently in off icial insc riptions an d coin s. In 50 the Sen ate voted he r the titl e Augusta, the fir st prominent impe rial wom an to hol d this title s ince Livi a and the latte r ha d only hel d it after Augus tus s deat h. She greeted for e ign embassi es to the empero r at Rome fr om her own trib unal , and tho se greetings wer e recorded i n official doc uments she al so wore a gold em broidered mil itary cloa k at offici al fu nctions. It is a s ign of her ove rt infl uence that a n e w colony on the Rhin e bore her name . Agr ippina s powerf ul p osition facilitate d the advanceme n t of her son Domit ius an d was, in turn, s trengthened b y it . Claudius alrea dy ha d a natural son, Br itannicus , who wa s still a minor . Domiti us, at13, was th ree yea rs older. N ow Claudius b egan to adv ance Domitius t hroug h various sign s of favor , the most impo rtant being h i s adoption as Claud ius s so n on 25 February A D 50. Henc e forth Domitius was kn own a s Nero Claudius Drusu s Germanic us Caesar and known t o po sterity simply as Nero . B ut Cl audius openly advance d N ero in other ways, too t h e emper or held the consulsh i p in 51, which was the yea r Ner o too k the toga of manh ood , and that event was i tself sta ge d several months be for e the customary age fo r Roman teen a gers Nero was gra nte d imperium proconsula re outside th e ci ty, addressed t he Se nate, appeared wit h Claudius at c ircu s games whil e Britan nicus appeare d still in the tog a o f a minor, an d was hail ed as Lea der of the Youth p rince ps iuventut is on the c oinage in AD 53 Nero marrie d Claudi us s dau ghter, Octavia . A ll of these are sure sig ns of pref erenc e in the ever u n stable imperial successio n schemes. T h e main difficult y fo r modern scholars lies i n how to ex plai n Claudius s favori ng of Nero over his nat ural son , Britann icus t he reason s remain a matter of int ense de bate. No matter what the reasons were, there can be littl e d o u b t that Nero, despite his tender age, had been cle arl y m ar ke d out as Claudius s successor. Agrippina, acc ordi ng t o T aci tus, now decided it was time to dispose o f Cla udiu s t o allo wNero to take over. The ancient acco unts a re co nfus ed a s is habitual in the cases of hid den an d dubio us de aths o f emperors but their genera l drif t is tha t Claudi us wa s poisoned with a treated mu shroom , that h e lingere d a whil e and had to be poisone d a seco nd time b efore dyin g on 13 O ctober 54 A.D. At n oon tha t same day , the sixteen year ol d Nero was acclai med empe ror in a ca refully orches trated pi ece of politi cal theat er. Alread y familiar to th e army an d the publi c, he face d no seriou s challenges to h is authori ty. Claudius and the Empire The invasion and annexatio n o f B r i tain was by far the most important and signific an t eve n t i n Claudius s reign. But several other issue s de serv e at tent ion his relationship with and treatmen t o f the a risto cracy ,his management of the provinces a nd t heir inh abitan ts, an d his judicial practices, and h is bu ilding ac tivitie s. Befo re looking at these subject s, how ever, we s hould no te tha t the long lived notion t hat Cla udius initi ated a co heren t policy of centralizat ion in t he Roman Emp ire evi dence d in the centralizat ion of pr ovincial admi nistratio n and ju dicial actions , in the cre ation of a dep artmenta l bureaucra cy, his in terference i n financial affa irs, an d so on ha s been decisively di sproven by a rece nt biogr aphy of Claudi u s. Whatever acti ons Claudius too k in regar d to the vario u s wings of gove rnment, he did s o without an y unifyin g polic y of central ization in mind. Claudius s relationship with the Senate did not g e t o f f t o a good start given the nature of his succe ss io n an d th e early revolt of Scribonianus with its ens uin g s how t rial s and it seems likely that distrust o f th e ar istocr acy i swhat impelled Claudius to elevat e the r ole o f his f reedme n. During his reign, however , Claudiu s mad e effort s to conc iliate Rome s leading co uncil, bu t he al so embark ed on prac tices that redounde d to his de triment , especiall y those o f sponsoring th e entrance me n conside red unworth y into th e Order and h earing delicat e cases be hind close d doors i n camera . In the last ana lysis, th e figures spe ak for them selve s 35 senators an d several h undred Knight s were driv e n to suicide or exec uted durin g the reign. Th e posthum ous v ilification of Cl audius in t he aristocrati c tradit ion als o bespeaks a dee p bitternes s and indicate s that , ultimately , Claudius s relationshi p with the Senat e s howed little imp rovement over time. Hi s reviving and h o lding the censorshi p i n 47 48 is typica l of the way th e re lationship betwee n S enate and empero r misfired Cla udius , no doubt, thoug ht h e was adhering t o ancient tra dition , but the emperor censo r only succeede d in elicit ing odiu m from those h e was asses sing. Claudius was remembered negatively by tradition a s b e i n g noticeably profligate in dispensing grants of R oma n c it iz enship to provincials he also admitted long hai red Ga ul s into the senatorial order, to the disple asur e o f the s nob bish incumbents. Both of these practic es de mons trate hi s co ncern for fair play and good gover nmen t for t he provin ces , despite his largely sedentar y reign unde r Claudius a re a ttributed the first issue s of stan ding or ders mandata fro m emperor to governor . In the o rganizat ion of the pro vinces , Claudius appear s to have p referre d direct administ ratio n over client k ingship. Und er him t he kingdoms of Mau retani a, Lycia, N oricum, and T hrace wer e converted into pr ovinces . Stabl e kingdoms, su ch as Bosp orus and Cilicia, we re lef t unt ouched. A goo d example o f the pattern is Hero d Agrip p a I. This clien t prince ha d grown up at Rome and h ad b een a warded tetra rchic land s in Galilee by Gaius Cali g ula . A s we saw ab ove, he ha d been involved in the acces s ion of Cl audius a nd, as a re ward for services rendered , h e was grant ed Ju daea and Sam aria in addition to hi s forme r holdings . H e fell from gra ce, however, when h e suspiciou sly exte nded J erusalem s wa lls and invited o ther eastern k ings t o a confe rence at Ti berias. He die d suddenly in 44 A .D. , after whic h his form er kingdom a gain came under dire c t Roman rule. One feature of Claudius s reign that the sources parti c u l a rly criticize is his handling of judicial matters . Wh i l e h e was certainly diligent in attending to heari ngs a n d c our t proceedings he was constantly presen t in cou r t an d hea rdcases even during family celebrati ons and f es tal d ays the sources accuse him of interf ering undu l y with c ases , of not listening to both side s of a case , o f makin g ridic ulous and or savage rulings , and of hea rin g delicat e case s in closed door privat e sessions wit h onl y his advi sors pr esent. The most cel ebrated and inf amou s of the latt er case s is that of Val erius Asiaticus , th e Gallic ex cons ul and o ne time frie nd of Claudius , who f ell from grace i n 47, repu tedlya t Messalina s in stigatio n. His case was h eard in th e em peror s bedroom a nd Asiati cus was forced t o suicide. E v en if a survey o f survivin g rulings by Claudi us do no t sho w him making s illy decisi ons, his judicial pr actic es caugh t suchatten tion that Se neca s Apocolocyntos i s ends wit h a courtroo m scene with C laudius as the acc used he is no t allowe d to make his def ence, is convict ed, an d condemne d to b e a powerless court room clerk. Su ch an ima ge must hav e b een mostpleasing t o the senator ial imaginat ion. Finally, there are Claudius s building activities. P u b l i c building was de rigueur for Roman emperors, and a nc ie n t a ccounts of individual reigns routinely includ e men ti o n of i mperial munificence. Matters hydraulic ac coun t fo r C laudius sgreatest constructional achievemen ts, i n th e for m of a n ew aqueduct for the city of Rome , a ne w por t at Po rtus nea r Ostia, and the draining o f the Fuc ine La ke. Th e sources a re at pains to highligh t the almo st cata strophi c outcome o f the latter project , but its s cale can not be d enied. Sueto nius s assessmen t that hi s public wo rks wer e grandiose an d necessary r ather tha n numerous i s entirel y correct. Conclusion Robert Graves fictional characterizati o n o f C l audius as an essentially benign man with a kee n i ntel lige nc e has tended to dominate the wider public s vi ew o f thi s em peror. Close study of the sources, how ever , reve al s a somewhat different kind of man. In addi tio n to hi s sch olarly an d cautious nature, he had a cru el s treak, a s sugg ested by h is addiction to gladiatoria l gam es and hi s fondn ess for wat ching his defeated oppo nent s executed . He condu cted closeddoor in camera t rial s of leadin g citizens t hat frequentl y resulted in t hei r ruin or deat hs an unpr ecedented an d tyrannica l patt ern of behavior . He had his w ife Messalin a execut ed, an d he personally p resided ove r a kangaroo cour ti n the Pr aetorian Camp in w hich many o f her hangers on l o st thei r lives. He abandone d his own so n Britannicus t o hi s fat e and favored the adv ancement of N ero as his s uccesso r . While he cannot be bla med for the di sastrou s way Nero s rule turned out, he mus t take some res pons ibility fo r puttin g that most unsuitab le youth on th e t hrone. At t he same tim e, his reign was m arked by som e n otable succe sses the inva sion of Britain , stabilit y and g ood govern ment in the provinces, and suc cessfu l managemen t of clie nt kingdoms. Claudiu s, then, i s a m ore enigmati c figur e than the other Julio Cl audian e mpe rors at once c arefu l, intelligent, aware and re spectf u

						

Creative Commons License This work is licensed under a Creative Commons License.
e-familytree.net is a welldesigned.net website