700000 people connected with European Royalty


	This is my personal genealogy hobby site. The data contained here has been gathered through 20 years of genealogy. Some of it is my research, much of it has been shared with me. DISCLAIMER: This is my speculative data. I've verified very little of it. Use it for hints and pointers, but do your own research! sponsored links
	John Michael Alaysus Healy and Irma Marie Everard Husband John Michael Alaysus Healy (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Irma Marie Everard ¹ Born: 27 Oct 1906 - La Madaline Pe'lange, Luxembourg, Europe ¹ Christened: Died: 5 Aug 1987 - Castro Valley, Aladeda County, California ¹ Buried: Father: Nicholas Everard (1884-1947) Mother: Margarite Basting (1885-1974) Other Spouse: Edward George Zimmer (1902-1982) ¹ - 14 Jun 1927 - St. Paul Catholic Church, Manitowoc, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin ¹ Noted events in her life were: • Baptism ¹, Cremated-Ashes Half Moon Bay, California • Confirmation ¹, Catholic • Adoption, 11 Feb 1997 - Cremated-Ashes Half Moon Bay, California • Adoption, 11 Feb 1997 - Catholic General Notes (Wife) [bobspu.ged] m1. Edward George Zimmer m2. John Michael Aloysus Healy Source: June Spurgeon-Oct 1997 James Everard Husband James Everard ² ³ ⁴ Born: 1509 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England Christened: Died: Abt 1531 - Y Buried: Marriage: Wife Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 F Nancy Everard ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ Born: 1527 - Southwark, Surrey, England ⁵ Christened: Died: - Y Buried: Spouse: Ephraim Allyne (1527-Abt 1567) ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ Marr: 1556 - Southwark, Surrey, England ⁵ 2 F Mary Everard ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ AKA: Mary Everard Born: 1528 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England Christened: Died: Abt 1567 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England Buried: Spouse: Baptist Hicks (1520-1565) ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ Marr: England General Notes for Child Mary Everard [mytree.FTW] see Baptist Hicks Mary EVARTS or EVERARD? This information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. James Everard Husband James Everard Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Noted events in his life were: • Fact 13, Fact 13 Researcher: Michael Roy Harrington, 1996 Wife Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 F Nancy Everard Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Spouse: Ephraim Allyne ( - ) James Everard Husband James Everard Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Noted events in his life were: • Fact 13, Fact 13 Researcher: Michael Roy Harrington, 1996 Wife Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 F Mary Everard Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Spouse: Baptiste Hicks (1526- ) John Everard and Marian Koepsel Husband John Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Nicholas Everard (1884-1947) Mother: Margarite Basting (1885-1974) Marriage: Wife Marian Koepsel Born: Christened: Died: 6 Nov 1996 - Arvada, Jefferson County, Colorado ¹ Buried: Father: William Koespel Mother: Children 1 F Patricia Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 2 M Michael Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 3 M William Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: John Everard and Anne Muxloe Husband John Everard ⁷ Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: 1745 Wife Anne Muxloe ⁷ Born: 1723 - Swepston, , Leicester, England Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Thomas Muxloe Jr (1681-1752) ⁷ Mother: Dorothy Charnell (1682-1754) ⁷ Children 1 F Elizabeth Everard ⁷ Born: 1746 - Swepston, , Leicester, England Christened: Died: Buried: Joseph Everard and Ruth Roberts Husband Joseph Everard ¹ Born: 7 Mar 1910 - Mineral Point, Green Co., Wisconsin Or Apr 7 1910 ¹ Christened: Died: 8 Feb 1989 - Chicago, Cook Co., Illinois ¹ Buried: Father: Nicholas Everard (1884-1947) Mother: Margarite Basting (1885-1974) Marriage: Noted events in his life were: • Baptism ¹, Cremated • Confirmation ¹, Catholic • Adoption, 1948 - Cremated • Adoption, 1948 - Catholic Wife Ruth Roberts (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 M Joseph John Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 2 F Pamela Theresa Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 3 M Thomas Charles Everard Born: 22 Sep 1950 ¹ Christened: Died: 21 Mar 1976 - Manitowoc County, Wisconsin-Drowned ¹ Buried: 4 F Audrea Kay Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 5 F Wanda Jayne Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 6 M Robert James Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 7 M David George Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Joseph John Everard Husband Joseph John Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Joseph Everard (1910-1989) ¹ Mother: Ruth Roberts Marriage: Wife (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Earl (Duke) Janda and Louise (Babe) Everard Husband Earl (Duke) Janda (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Louise (Babe) Everard ¹ Born: 14 Jul 1917 - Caspian, Michigan ¹ Christened: Died: 9 Oct 1990 - Manitowoc, Manitowoc County, Wisconsin ¹ Buried: Father: Nicholas Everard (1884-1947) Mother: Margarite Basting (1885-1974) Noted events in her life were: • Baptism ¹, Evergreen Crmetery, Manitowoc, Manituwoc Co, Wisconsin • Confirmation ¹, Catholic • Adoption, 1948 - Evergreen Crmetery, Manitowoc, Manituwoc Co, Wisco • Adoption, 1948 - Catholic Children 1 M Robert Janda (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 2 M John Janda (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Robert Rose and Margery Everard Husband Robert Rose ² Born: Abt 1594 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England Christened: Died: 4 Apr 1665 - Branford, New Haven, CT Buried: Marriage: Abt 1618 - London, Middlesex County, England Other Spouse: Elizabeth Potter Parker ( -1677) ² - 7 Jun 1664 - New Haven Colony, CT Other Spouse: Elizabeth ( -1677) ² - After 7 Jun 1664 Wife Margery Everard ² Born: Abt 1594 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England Christened: Died: Abt 1644 - Branford, New Haven, CT Buried: Father: Thomas Gawdy Everard Esq. ( - ) ² Mother: Agnes Mannock ( - ) ² Children 1 M Robert Rose ² Born: 1619 - London, Middlesex County, England Christened: Died: 1683 Buried: Spouse: Rebecca ( - ) ² Spouse: Phebe Dickinson ( - ) ² Spouse: Ellen Luddington (Abt 1624-After 1656) ² Marr: 3 Mar 1653 - New Haven, New Haven County, CT Spouse: Ellen Moulthrop (1619- ) ² Marr: Mar 1663 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England 2 F Elizabeth Rose ² Born: 1621 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England Christened: Died: 22 Jul 1659 - Branford, CT Buried: Spouse: Michael Taintor (1625-1673) ² Marr: 1649 - Branford, CT 3 F Mary Rose ² Born: 1623 Christened: Died: Buried: 4 M Samuel Rose ² Born: 1625 Christened: Died: 1698 Buried: Spouse: Mary Tompkins (1643- ) ² 5 F Sarah Rose ² Born: 1627 Christened: Died: Buried: 6 M Daniel Rose ² Born: Abt 1631 - New Haven, New Haven County, CT Christened: Died: After 1694 - Wethersfield, CT Buried: Spouse: Elizabeth Goodrich (1645-After 1681) ² Marr: 1664 - Wethersfield, CT 7 F Dorcas Rose ² Born: 1632 - Stratford, England Christened: Died: 1708 - Branford, New Haven, CT Buried: Spouse: Daniel Swaine (Abt 1630-1691) ² Marr: 26 Jul 1683 - Branford, CT 8 M Jonathan Rose ² Born: Abt 1634 - Wethersford, CT Christened: Died: 21 Aug 1684 - Branford, New Haven, CT Buried: Spouse: Delivered Charles (Abt 1640-1709) ² Marr: 5 Jan 1669 - Branford, New Haven County, CT 9 F Hannah Rose ² Born: Abt 1636 Christened: Died: After 1685 Buried: Spouse: Benoni Frisbie (1656-1700) ² Marr: 1678 - Branford, New Haven, CT General Notes (Husband) Robert and Margery Rose came to America on the ship Fr a n c i s, arriving 30 April 1634 at Plymouth or Boston, Ma ss ac hu s etts. Here is a list of passengers on the ship: THE FRANCIS ------------------------------------------------------ - - - - ------------ ---------- 30 April 1634. Passenger s o f t h e Fr ancis of Ipswich, Mr. John Cutting, captain , bou nd f o r Ne w England (landed at Plymouth or Boston , MA): f rom t h e Pubi c Record Office, Kew, Richmond, Sur rey TW9 4 DU, En gl and) John Beetes aged 40 William Haulton 23 Nicholas Jenn i n g s 2 2 William Westwoode 28 and Bridgett his wife 32 , Jo h n L ea 1 3, Grace Newell 13 Cleeare Draper 30 Rober t Ros e 4 0 an d Mar gery his wife 40, John Rose 15, Rober t Ros e 15 , Eliza beth R ose 13, Mary Rose 11, Samuell Ros e 9, S ara h Rose 7 , Danyel l Rose 3, Darcas Rose 2 John B ernar d 36 a nd Mary h is wife 3 8, Fayth Newell 14, Henr y Hawar d 7 Will iam Freebo urne 40 an d Mary his wife 33 , Mary Fre ebourne 7 , Sarah Fre ebourne 2 , John Aldburg h 14; Anthon y White 2 7 Edwawrd Bugb ye 40 an d Rebecca hi s wife 32, Sa rah Bugby e 4 Abraham Newe ll 50 an d Franci s his wife 40 , Abraham Ne well 8, John Newe ll 5, Isa ack e Newell 22 Jus t Houlding 2 3 (see Note) John P ease 27 , F ayth Clearke 15 , Robert Peas e 3, Darcas Greene 1 5 Ro bert Wi nge 60 and J udith his wif e 43 John Greene 27 Ro b ert Pease 2 7 Hugh Ma son 28 and Hes ter his wife 22 Rowla n d Stebing 40 a nd Sar ah his wife 43 , Thomas Stebing 14 , Sar ah Stebing 11 , Eli zabeth Stebin g 6, John Stebing 8 , Mary W inche 15 Thom a s Sherwood 48 an d Alice his wif e 47, Anna Sh erwood 14 , Ros e Sherwood 11 , Thomas Sherwo od 10, Rebecca S herwoo d 9 Thoma s King 19 J ohn Mapes 2 1 Mary Blosse 40, Ric har d Blosse 11 R obert Co e 38 and A nna his wife, John Co e 8 , Robert Coe 7, B enjami n Co e 5 Mary Onge 27 Thomas Bo yde n 21 Richard Wattli n 2 8 Jo hn Lyvermore 28 Richard Pep per 2 7 and Mary his wif e 3 0 , Mary Pepper 3 1/2, Stephe n Becket t 11 Richard Hould i n g 25 Judeth Garnett 26; Eliz abeth Hamo nd 47e limped , h e dro oled, he stuttered and wa s constantl y ill. Hi s fami ly memb ers mistook these phys ical debiliti es as r eflectiv e of ment al infirmity and ge nerally kept hi m ou t of the p ublic eye a s an embarrassme nt. A sign of th i s familial di sdain is tha t he remaine d under guardians hip , like a woma n, even afte r he had re ached the age o f major ity. Suetoni us, in particu lar, pre serves comment s of Anton ia, his mot her, and Livia , his g randmother, w hich are part icularly c ruel in their as sess ment of th e boy. From the sa me source , however, it emer g es that A ugustus suspected tha t ther e was more to this "i d iot" t han met the eye. Neverth eless , Claudius spent hi s ent ir e childhood and youth in al mos t complete seclusio n. Th e n ormal rites de passage of a n i mperial prince cam e an d wen t without official notice, a n d Claudius receive d n o summon s to public office or orde r s to command troo p s on the front iers. When he assumed t h e toga virilis , fo r instance, he wa s carried to the Capi to l in a litt er a t night; the normal p rocedure was to b e le d into th e For um by one's father or gu ardian in ful l publi c view . Ho w he spent the voluminous fre e time of h is yout h i s reve aled by his later character: h e read vora ciousl y . He bec ame a scholar of considerable abi lity an d comp ose d work s on all subjects in the liberal arts , esp ecia lly hi stor y; he was the last person we know of wh o co ul d read Et ru scan. These skills, and the knowledge o f g o vernmenta l i nstitutions he acquired from studying hist o ry , were t o sta nd him in good stead when he came to po wer. It should not be forgotten that Claudius's wing of t h e f a m ily suffered terribly in the internal struggles f o r suc ce ss ion that racked the imperial house. His fath e r died o n c amp aign when Claudius was only one year ol d , and his b elov ed b rother, Germanicus, succumbed unde r s uspicious ci rcums tance s in AD 19. His only other sib lin g to reach adu lthood , Livi lla, became involved wit h Seja nus and paid th e ultim ate pri ce in the wake of th e latte r's fall from gr ace in A D 31. Th rough all this t urmoil C laudius survived , primaril y throug h being ignor ed as a n embarrassment an d an idiot. Claudius's fortunes changed somewhat when his unstab l e n e p hew, Gaius (Caligula), came to power in the spri n g o f 3 7 A. D. Gaius, it seems, liked to use his bookis h , frai l un cle a s the butt of cruel jokes and, in keepi n g with t his p atter n of behavior, promoted him to a suf fe ct consul ship o n 1 Ju ly 37 A.D. At 46 years of age, i t w as Claudiu s's fir st publ ic office. Despite this sort ie i nto publi c life, h e seeme d destined for a relativel y qui et and sec luded dota ge when , in January 41, event s overt ook him. Accession (24-25 January, 41 A.D.) Arguably the most i m p o r tant period of Claudius's reign was its first few h ou r s . Th e events surrounding his accession are worthy o f d et ai led d escription, since they revealed much abou t th e tru e n atur e of the Augustan Principate. In the early afternoon of 24 January 41 A.D., the em p e r o r Gaius was attending a display of dancers in a the at e r n ea r the palace. Claudius was present. Shortly bef or e l unc h ti me, Claudius took his leave and the empero r de cide d th at he , too, would adjourn for a bath. As Ga ius w as ma kin g his wa y down an isolated palace corrido r he wa s surr ound ed and cu t down by discontented member s of hi s own bo dygua rd. In th e aftermath of the assassi nation - - the fir st ope n murder o f a Roman emperor -- t here wa s widesprea d pani c and confusi on. The German ele ments o f the emperor 's body guard, who wer e fiercely loy al to th eir chief, wen t on th e rampage and ki lled indis criminate ly. Soldiers o f the lar ger Praetorian Gu ard be gan lootin g the imperia l palace. Ac cording to the bes t- known tradi tion, some Gua rdsmen foun d Claudius cowerin g b ehind a cu rtain and, on t he spot, the y declared hi m their e mpero r and carried hi m off to thei r camp. In t his story , a ha pless Claudius fa lls into powe r entirel y as a resul t o f accident, and ver y much agains t his wi ll. It is not h a rd to see why, wit h its implicit t hem e of recusatio imp erii , it is the stor y of his accessi o n that Claudius him self fa vored. Vestige s, however, ca n b e traced of anothe r traditio n that paint s a somewha t diffe rent picture. I n this version , the Guar dsmen mee t in thei r camp and dis cuss the situatio n facin g them i n light of G aius's murde r. Their pleasant, c ity-b ased t erms of militar y servic e were in jeopardy. The y nee de d an emperor. Fixin g thei r intentions on Claudius a s t h e only surviving matur e me mber of the Julio-Claudian h o us e, they sent out a par t y of troops to find him and b ri n g him back to their cam p s o he could be acclaimed em pero r , which is what happen ed. I n this story, the eleva tion o f C laudius to the purp le wa s a purposeful plan o n the par t o f the soldiers, ev en if C laudius remain s a passive an d relu ctant partner i n the who le process. The possibility has to be entertained that Claud i u s w a s a far more active participant in his own elevat i o n tha n e ither of these traditions let on. There is ju s t r easo n to s uspect that he may even have been involv e d in p lanni ng th e murder of Gaius -- his departure fr o m the the ater m inute s before the assassination appear s a ltogethe r too for tuitou s. These possibilities, howev er , must rema in pure sp eculati on, since the ancient evi den ce offers no thing expli cit in t he way of support fo r the m. On the oth er hand, w e can hardl y expect them to , give n the later pa ttern of ev ents. The wh ole issue o f Claudi us's possible i nvolvement i n the death o f Gaiu s and hi s own subsequent a cclamation b y the Praetori a n Guard mus t, therefore, remai n moot. Despite the circumstances that brought him there, th e h o u r s following Claudius's arrival at the Praetoria n Cam p a n d h is acceptance as emperor by the Senate ar e vita l one s f or t he history of the Principate. Event s could h ave ta ke n a ver y different course, but that th ey worke d out a s the y did sp eaks volumes as to how fa r seven dec ades o f the Au gustan Pr incipate had remove d Rome from th e possi bility o f a retur n to the so-calle d free Republic. News of Gaius's death prompted a meeting of the Sena t e . I n itially, there was talk of declaring the Republi c r es tor e d and dispensing with emperors altogether. The n, h owe ver , v arious senators began proposing that the y be ch ose n a s th e next princeps. Debate was in progres s when n ew s reac hed t he senators that the Guard had mad e the dec isi on fo r them : Claudius, the soldiers' choice , was sitt in g in th e Praeto rian Camp. The main historic al difficul t y in wha t happene d next is due to confusio n in Josephus ' s accoun t (which i s the fullest). In on e version, the S en ate sen t two tribune s to the Camp t o demand that Claud iu s step do wn. Once in th e Camp, how ever, the tribunes w er e cowed b y the ardent supp ort fo r Claudius among the s old iers and i nstead requested t ha t he come to the Senat e t o be ratifie d as emperor. In Jo s ephus's alternate ver sion , however, He rod Agrippa is s ummon ed by the senator s an d employed as a n envoy betwee n the Cam p and the Sena te. C learly, Josephu s is conveyi ng two tradit ions abou t thes e events, one Roma n (featur ing the tribunes) , th e other J ewish (highlightin g the r ole of Herod Agrippa ) . Suetonius , naturally enough , fol lows the Roman tradit ion , as doe s Dio in his main acc ou nt; interestingly, th e latte r show s awareness of some p a rticipation on the pa rt of Hero d Ag rippa in a later pa ssag e. Regardless of how the negotiations were conducted, t h e S e n ate quickly realized it was powerless in the pres en c e o f se veral thousand armed men supporting Claudius' s c an dida cy. T he impotence that the esteemed council ha d ex per ience d tim e and again when dealing with the mili tar y dyna sts o f the L ate Republic was once more reveale d t o all, a nd th e meetin g dissolved with the fate of th e Em pire lef t undec ided. Whe n the Senate met again late r tha t night i n the Te mple of Ju piter Victor, it foun d its nu mbers muc h depleted , since man y had fled the ci ty to the ir countr y estates. T he senator s assessed thei r militar y strength : they had thr ee or fou r urban cohor ts under t he comman d of the City Pre fect, numb ering per haps 3, 00 0 men. Wit h these, they occupi ed the Foru m an d Palatine . Plans wer e laid to arm some ex- slaves to p r ovide reinf orcements. B y these actions the sen ators we re ac ceptin g that suprem e power in post-Augustan R ome c ould be a chi eved only by m ilitary force; all questio n s of legal nic e ties were irrel evant. But the Senate co ul d not contro l thei r troops -- t hey all deserted to th e Pra etorian Gu ard, wit h whom the y shared the Camp. Now completely powerless, the senators hurried o f f t o t h e Praetorian Camp to pay their respects to Clau di us . O n 2 5 January 41 A.D. Claudius was formally inves te d wi th a ll t he powers of the princeps, becoming Ti. C lau diu s Caesa r Aug ustus Germanicus. (Since Claudius ha d n o lega l clai m to i t whatsoever, the appearance of "C aesa r" in h is impe rial na me marks the first step in thi s wor d's tran smutatio n fro m a family name to a title de notin g ruler, a nd so beg in s a tradition that stretche s into t he modern e ra with "K ais er," "Czar," and possib ly "Shah. ") These events have been treated in some detail beca u s e o f t heir immense historical importance. Gaius was t h e f irs t emp eror of Rome to be openly murdered, and Cla ud ius' s ac cessio n marks the first overt and large-scal e in trusi on o f the mi litary into post-Augustan politics . Th e basi c fac t of the P rincipate, which had always be en im plici t in th e Augustan s ettlement but heretofore c areful ly dis guised , was now mad e plain: the emperor's p ositio n ultima tely re sted not on co nsensus but on the s words o f the sol diers wh o paid him homa ge. From one per spective , the Prin cipate ha d been reveale d for what i t truly wa s -- an exer cise in ma naging the mili tary's l oyalties, a nd not a for m of governm ent rooted in la w an d consensus . The Senate , in attemptin g to block Claudi u s with troop s of their ow n, had acquiesc ed in this str uctur e of powe r. For ever af terward, emperor s sat on th e thron e on th e sufferance o f the troops they c ommanded , and a los s o f army loyalty n ecessarily entaile d a los s of power, us u ally accompanie d by the loss of th e incu mbent's life. B ut t he harder les sons in these realit ie s lay in the futu re; fo r the momen t order had been rest o red, and Claudiu s embarke d on his r eign in relative se curi ty. The Early Years: Britain, Freedmen, and Messali n a ( A D 4 1 - 48) Among Claudius's first acts was the app re hens io n an d execution of Gaius's assassins. Whateve r hi s opin io n of t heir actions, politics and pietas req uire d that C lau dius no t be seen to condone men who murd ere d an empero r an d a memb er of his own family. He als o dis played immed iat e understan ding of the centrality o f th e military to h is p osition an d sought to create a m ilita ry image for him sel f that his pr ior sheltered exis tenc e had denied him. P repa rations got un der way soon a fte r his accession fo r a majo r military exped ition int o Bri tain, perhaps spark ed by a n attempted revol t of th e gove rnor of Dalmatia, L . Arrunti us Camillus Scribo nia nus, i n 42 A.D.. The invasi on itself , spearheaded by fo u r legi ons, commenced in th e summer o f 43 and was to la st fo r d ecades, ultimately fa lling shor t of the annexat ion of t h e whole island (if ind eed that wa s Claudius' s final obj ecti ve at the outset). T his move mar ked th e first majo r additio n to the territor y of the Roma n em pire since th e reign of A ugustus. Claudi us himself to o k part in the c ampaign, arrivi ng in the wa r zone wit h an e ntourage of e x-consuls in the l ate summe r of 43 A .D. Afte r a parade a t Camulodunum (Colche ster) t o impre ss the nati ves, he re turned to Rome to celebr at e a triu mph in 44 A.D . His mil itary credentials had be e n firml y established. The sources are united in portraying Claudius a s a d u p e t o his imperial freedmen advisors as well as t o hi s wi ve s. I t is possible that the hostile stance o f the e lit e tow ard C laudius extended back into his reig n -- h e was , afte r all , a usurper who had been foiste d on th e aristo crats b y th e soldiers. If so, Claudius' s relianc e on hi s freedme n ma y have stemmed from this c ircumstanc e, in th at the ex- slave s were (as far as he w as concerne d) more t rustworth y than t he sullen aristocr acy. For wha tever reas ons, ther e is no do ubt that Claud ius's reign i s the firs t era of th e great imp erial free dman. To be su re, the sec retariat ha d existed bef ore Cl audius and memb ers of it ha d achieved s ome prominenc e ( notably Helico n and Callistu s under Gaius) , but the ri s e of powerful i ndividuals lik e Narcissus, Pol ybius, an d Pal las was a di stinctive mar k of Claudius's rei gn. Th e power o f these m en was demonst rated early on whe n th e emperor chos e Narc issus as his en voy to the legion s a s they hesitated t o e mbark on their i nvasion of Britai n . According to our so u rces, the freedme n were frequent ly t o exert less benefi cen t influences thr oughout Claud ius's r eign. In 38 A.D. Claudius had married Valeria Messalina , a s c i o n of a noble house with impressive familial con nectio n s . Me ssalina bore him a daughter (Octavia, bor n in 39 ) a n d a so n (Britannicus, born in 41): she was t herefor e th e m other o f the heir-apparent and enjoyed in fluenc e for t ha t reason . In the sources, Messalina is p ortraye d as lit tl e more tha n a pouting adolescent nymph omania c who hold s wi ld partie s and arranges the death s of form er lovers o r tho se who sco rn her advances; an d all thi s while her cu ckolde d husband b lunders on in b lissful ig norance. Recent ly, att empts have b een made t o rehabilita te Messalina a s an astut e player of c ourt p olitics who u sed sex as a we apon, but i n the end we h av e little way o f knowing the tr uth. What w e can say is th a t either he r love of parties ( on the adole scent model ) or h er byzan tine scheming (on th e able courti er model ) brough t her d own. While Claudius w as away in Ost ia i n AD 48, Mess alin a had a party in the p alace in the co u rse of which a ma r riage ceremony was perf ormed (or playa c ted) between herse l f and a consul-designa te, C. Silius . Wh atever the inten tion s behind it, the pol itical rami ficatio ns of this fol ly wer e sufficiently grav e to caus e the summ ary executio n of Mess alina, Silius, an d assor ted hangers-o n (orchest rated, telli ngly, by the fr eedma n Narcissus). Cl audius w as now withou t a wife. The Rise of Agrippina and Claudius's Death (48-54 A . D . ) I n our sources, the death of Messalina is present e d a s i niti ating a scramble among the freedmen, each wi sh in g to p lac e his preferred candidate at Claudius's si d e a s the ne w emp ress. In the end, it was Pallas who pr ev aile d when h e convi nced Claudius to marry Agrippina t h e Young er. The m arriag e took place within months of Me ss alina' s execution . Agripp ina was a colorful figure wi t h extensi ve and far-r eaching i mperial connections: sh e w as the dau ghter of Clau dius's bro ther, Germanicus, a n d a sister o f Gaius Caligula , by whom s he had been exi le d for involve ment in the consp iracy of Gae tulicus; mo reo ver, she had b een married before . She therefo re brou gh t to the marriag e with Claudius -- w hich necessita t e d a change in the la w to allow uncles to m arry their br o t hers' daughters - - a son, L. Domitius Aheno barbus. Ag ri ppin a's ambitions f or this son proved the undo ing o f Cla udius. The years between his marriage to Agrippina in 4 8 a n d h i s death in 54 were difficult ones for Claudius . Whe th e r o r not sources are right to portray him a s a dupe o f h i s wiv es and freedmen throughout his reign , there ca n b e li ttle d oubt that Agrippina's powerful p ersonalit y domi nate d Claudi us's last years. Her positio n, openl y influen tia l in a mann er unlike any previous e mpress, w as recogni ze d by those att uned to imperial pol itics, an d she appear s m ore and more pr ominently in off icial insc riptions an d coin s. In 50 the Sen ate voted he r the titl e "Augusta, " the fir st prominent impe rial wom an to hol d this title s ince Livi a -- and the latte r ha d only hel d it after Augus tus's deat h. She greeted for e ign embassi es to the empero r at Rome fr om her own trib unal , and tho se greetings wer e recorded i n official doc uments ; she al so wore a gold-em broidered mil itary cloa k at offici al fu nctions. It is a s ign of her ove rt infl uence that a n e w colony on the Rhin e bore her name . Agr ippina's powerf ul p osition facilitate d the advanceme n t of her son Domit ius an d was, in turn, s trengthened b y it . Claudius alrea dy ha d a natural son, Br itannicus , who wa s still a minor . Domiti us, at 13, was th ree yea rs older. N ow Claudius b egan to adv ance Domitius t hroug h various sign s of favor , the most impo rtant being h i s adoption as Claud ius's so n on 25 February A D 50. Henc e forth Domitius was kn own a s Nero Claudius Drusu s Germa nic us Caesar and known t o po sterity simply as "Nero" . B ut Cl audius openly advance d N ero in other ways, too: t h e emper or held the consulsh i p in 51, which was the yea r Ner o too k the "toga of manh ood ," and that event was i tself sta ge d several months be for e the customary age fo r Roman teen a gers; Nero was gra nte d imperium proconsula re outside th e ci ty, addressed t he Se nate, appeared wit h Claudius at c ircu s games (whil e Britan nicus appeare d still in the tog a o f a minor), an d was hail ed as "Lea der of the Youth" (p rince ps iuventut is) on the c oinage ; in AD 53 Nero marrie d Claudi us's dau ghter, Octavia . A ll of these are sure sig ns of pref erenc e in the ever-u n stable imperial successio n schemes. T h e main difficult y fo r modern scholars lies i n how to ex plai n Claudius' s favori ng of Nero over his nat ural son , Britann icus; t he reason s remain a matter of int ense de bate. No matter what the reasons were, there can be littl e d o u b t that Nero, despite his tender age, had been cle arl y m ar ke d out as Claudius's successor. Agrippina, acc ordi ng t o T aci tus, now decided it was time to dispose o f Cla udiu s t o allo w Nero to take over. The ancient acco unts a re co nfus ed -- a s is habitual in the cases of hid den an d dubio us de aths o f emperors -- but their genera l drif t is tha t Claudi us wa s poisoned with a treated mu shroom , that h e lingere d a whil e and had to be poisone d a seco nd time b efore dyin g on 13 O ctober 54 A.D. At n oon tha t same day , the sixteen -year-ol d Nero was acclai med empe ror in a ca refully orches trated pi ece of politi cal theat er. Alread y familiar to th e army an d the publi c, he face d no seriou s challenges to h is authori ty. Claudius and the Empire The invasion and annexatio n o f B r i tain was by far the most important and signific an t eve n t i n Claudius's reign. But several other issue s de serv e at tent ion: his relationship with and treatmen t o f the a risto cracy , his management of the provinces a nd t heir inh abitan ts, an d his judicial practices, and h is bu ilding ac tivitie s. Befo re looking at these subject s, how ever, we s hould no te tha t the long-lived notion t hat Cla udius initi ated a co heren t policy of centralizat ion in t he Roman Emp ire -- evi dence d in the centralizat ion of pr ovincial admi nistratio n and ju dicial actions , in the cre ation of a dep artmenta l bureaucra cy, his in terference i n financial affa irs, an d so on -- ha s bee n decisively di sproven by a rece nt biogr aphy of Claudi u s. Whatever acti ons Claudius too k in regar d to the vario u s wings of gove rnment, he did s o without an y unifyin g polic y of central ization in mind. Claudius's relationship with the Senate did not g e t o f f t o a good start -- given the nature of his succe ss io n an d th e early revolt of Scribonianus with its ens uin g s how t rial s -- and it seems likely that distrust o f th e ar istocr acy i s what impelled Claudius to elevat e the r ole o f his f reedme n. During his reign, however , Claudiu s mad e effort s to conc iliate Rome's leading co uncil, bu t he al so embark ed on prac tices that redounde d to his de triment , especiall y those o f sponsoring th e entrance me n conside red unworth y into th e Order and h earing delicat e cases be hind close d doors (i n camera) . In the last ana lysis, th e figures spe ak for them selve s: 35 senators an d several h undred Knight s were driv e n to suicide or exec uted durin g the reign. Th e posthum ous v ilification of Cl audius in t he aristocrati c tradit ion als o bespeaks a dee p bitternes s and indicate s that , ultimately , Claudius' s relationshi p with the Senat e s howed little imp rovemen t over time. Hi s reviving and h o lding the censorshi p i n 47-48 is typica l of the way th e re lationship betwee n S enate and empero r misfired: Cla udius , no doubt, thoug ht h e was adhering t o ancient tra dition , but the emperor -censo r only succeede d in elicit ing odiu m from those h e was asses sing. Claudius was remembered (negatively) by tradition a s b e i n g noticeably profligate in dispensing grants of R oma n c it iz enship to provincials; he also admitted "long -hai red " Ga ul s into the senatorial order, to the disple asur e o f the s nob bish incumbents. Both of these practic es de mons trate hi s co ncern for fair play and good gover nmen t for t he provin ces , despite his largely sedentar y reign : unde r Claudius a re a ttributed the first issue s of stan ding or ders (mandata ) fro m emperor to governor . In the o rganizat ion of the pro vinces , Claudius appear s to have p referre d direct administ ratio n over client k ingship. Und er him t he kingdoms of Mau retani a, Lycia, N oricum, and T hrace wer e converted into pr ovinces . Stabl e kingdoms, su ch as Bosp orus and Cilicia, we re lef t unt ouched. A goo d example o f the pattern is Hero d Agrip p a I. This clien t prince ha d grown up at Rome and h ad b een a warded tetra rchic land s in Galilee by Gaius (Cali g ula). A s we saw ab ove, he ha d been involved in the acces s ion of Cl audius a nd, as a re ward for services rendered , h e was grant ed Ju daea and Sam aria in addition to hi s forme r holdings . H e fell from gra ce, however, when h e suspiciou sly exte nded J erusalem's wa lls and invited o ther eastern k ings t o a confe rence at Ti berias. He die d suddenly in 44 A .D. , after whic h his form er kingdom a gain came under dire c t Roman rule. One feature of Claudius's reign that the sources parti c u l a rly criticize is his handling of judicial matters . Wh i l e h e was certainly diligent in attending to heari ngs a n d c our t proceedings -- he was constantly presen t in cou r t an d hea rd cases even during family celebrati ons and f es tal d ays - - the sources accuse him of interf ering undu l y with c ases , of not listening to both side s of a case , o f makin g ridic ulous and/or savage rulings , and of hea rin g delicat e case s in closed-door privat e sessions wit h onl y his advi sors pr esent. The most cel ebrated and inf amou s of the latt er case s is that of Val erius Asiaticus , th e Gallic ex-cons ul and o ne-time frie nd of Claudius , who f ell from grace i n 47, repu tedly a t Messalina's in stigatio n. His case was h eard in th e em peror's bedroom a nd Asiati cus was forced t o suicide. E v en if a survey o f survivin g rulings by Claudi us do no t sho w him making s illy decisi ons, his judicial pr actic es caugh t such atten tion that Se neca's Apocolocyntos i s ends wit h a courtroo m scene with C laudius as the acc used : he is no t allowe d to make his def ence, is convict ed, an d condemne d to b e a powerless court room clerk. Su ch an ima ge must hav e b een most pleasing t o the senator ial imaginat ion. Finally, there are Claudius's building activities. P u b l i c building was de rigueur for Roman emperors, and a nc ie n t a ccounts of individual reigns routinely includ e men ti o n of i mperial munificence. Matters hydraulic ac coun t fo r C laudius 's greatest constructional achievemen ts, i n th e for m of a n ew aqueduct for the city of Rome , a ne w por t at Po rtus nea r Ostia, and the draining o f the Fuc ine La ke. Th e sources a re at pains to highligh t the almo st cata strophi c outcome o f the latter project , but its s cale can not be d enied. Sueto nius's assessmen t that "hi s public wo rks wer e grandiose an d necessary r ather tha n numerous" i s entirel y correct. Conclusion Robert Graves' fictional characterizati o n o f C l audius as an essentially benign man with a kee n i ntel lige nc e has tended to dominate the wider public' s vi ew o f thi s em peror. Close study of the sources, how ever , reve al s a somew hat different kind of man. In addi tio n to hi s sch olarly an d cautious nature, he had a cru el s treak, a s sugg ested by h is addiction to gladiatoria l gam es and hi s fondn ess for wat ching his defeated oppo nent s executed . He condu cted closed- door (in camera ) t rial s of leadin g citizens t hat frequentl y resulted in t hei r ruin or deat hs -- an unpr ecedented an d tyrannica l patt ern of behavior . He had his w ife Messalin a execut ed, an d he personally p resided ove r a kangaroo cour t i n the Pr aetorian Camp in w hich many o f her hangers-on l o st thei r lives. He abandone d his own so n Britannicus t o hi s fat e and favored the adv ancement of N ero as his s uccesso r . While he cannot be bla med for the di sastrou s way Nero 's r ule turned out, he mus t take some res pons ibility fo r puttin g that most unsuitab le youth on th e t hrone. At t he same tim e, his reign was m arked by som e n otable succe sses: the inva sion of Britain , stabilit y and g ood govern ment in the provi nces, and suc cessfu l managemen t of clie nt kingdoms. Claudiu s, then, i s a m ore enigmati c figur e than the other Julio-Cl audian e mpe rors: at once c arefu l, intelligent, aware and re spectf u General Notes for Child Jonathan Rose Jonathan2 Rose (Robert'), b. New England ca 1634-35, d e c e a sed least by 21Aug. 1684 (inv. est.), m. 5 Jan. 166 9 , B ra nf ord, Conn. VR, Delivered Charles, daughter of J oh n Ch arl es . Her first name was omitted from the marria g e recor ds , bu t is amply proved from deeds. She m. 2ndl y , John Ja mes . Sh e d. at least by 26 Jan. 1709 when agr ee ment regar din g lan d of father and mother, both deceas ed , was made b y he irs (s ee later). From Typescript of Branford Town Records: Vol. 2, part 1, p. 77, orig. p. 85, Jonathan Rose of B r a n f ord for E01-10-00 sold to Samuel Bradford of same, land laying in th e f i e l d called "oister neck" being about 2 acres, bou n d e d b y m ' v land on south, and by Nathaniel Gunn an d Jo h n C olli ns, delivered 1 Jan. 1673 Ibid., p. 342, orig. p. 377, on 20 July 1674, Robe r t R o s e of Stratford,Fairfield Co., to beloved brothe r Jo nath a n R ose of Branford, my part or parcel of uplan d liv in g i n grea t plaine formerly my father Roses, cont aini n g 2 acre s, an d one parcel of meadow at parks hole , fo r fi ve pounds. Ibid., p. 145, orig. p. 148, 3 Dec. 1679, Henry Grat w i c k t o Jonathan Rose "fresh meadow" wit. by Eleazar St e n t an d Ma rtha Whitehead Ibid., p. 146, orig. p. 149, the former grant of 2 0 a c r e s to Robert Rosesenr. not being found on the reco rds , t h e t own meeting agreed to record to Jonathan Ros e a s succ es sor , 3 Dec. 1679. Ibid., p. 342, orig. p. 377, Daniel Rose of Wethersf i e l d t o JonathanRose of Branford, 2 acres in the grea t pl ai n e , 3 Mar. 1674/5 Settlement of the estate of John Charles of Branfo r d i n 1 6 73 mentions daughter De --- red, wife of Jonath a n Ros e, a n d makes bequests to their son John and daugh te r Lydi a . A la rge ink blot covers part of her name (Ne w H aven Co un ty Cour t Vol. 1, in Jacobus MS.). Inventory of the estate of Jonathan Rose dated 21 Au g . 1 6 8 4 was presented to New Haven County court 10 Jun e 1 685 . A dm inistration was granted to his widow Deliver ance . A n ord e r was made 17 June 1686 assigning the sam e to h is w idow , hi s eldest son John and three other chi ldren , appoi ntin g hi s widow as guardian of the childre n and p rovidin g tha t th e three sons should receive thei r portio ns whe n twenty -one , and the only daughter her p ortion wh en eigh teen year s o f age (Ibid.) On 26 Jan. 1709 an agreement was made regarding la n d o f o u r hon'd fatherJonathan Rose late of Branford de c' d an d al s o estate or thirds of our honored mother Del ive red R ose ( al ias James) also dec'd; our two brothersJ oh n and Jo natha n Ro se, have out of estate sum of 5 lbs . an d 15 sh . andtha t i s to be full? of their part of pe rsona l estat e and tha t Sam ll Rosehave moveables ctc., a nd 20l bs.; ou r brother C aleb F rysbee in right ofhis wif e Hanna h 30 lbs .; also to p ay to o ur Father in law Mr . John Jam es,etc. I t is signed b y John J ames, John Rose , Jonatha n Rose, Saml l Rose,Caleb F risbie, a nd acknowle dged 25 Ju ly 1712 by th e parties (Bran fordDeed s 3:110). A most important deed proving relationships appear s i n B r a nford (2:119);John Rose Junr. of Branford, elde st s o n o f Ho n. father Jonathan Rose lateof Branford dec 'd a n d Hon . moth er Deliurcd Rose, made over to aunt Dor casSw ai ne o f sd Bran ford (widow) right in land of our f athe r bou ght o f my uncl e Robert Rose, dated 4 July 1698. After the death of Jonathan Rose, his widow and chil d r e n w ere named in a number of transactions in the Bran fo r d T ow n Records: 7:ypescript, vol. 2, part 1, p. 110, Thomas Harris o n S e n n and widow Roselaid out 30 acres formerly grant e d to M r . J asper Craine and Robert Rose,8 Mar. 1686/7 [bid., p. 110, next item, Thomas Harrison Senn and w i d o w R ose, an agreement dated 8 Mar. 1686-87, and she s i g n s b y a D mark Ibid. p. 111, Dcliuer Rose widow and relict of Jonat h a n R o se dec'd, named in inventory of --- Charles 18 Ju l y 1 686 Ibid., p. 127, 26 Feb. 1688, liberty to widow Rose t o c h a n ge her cow pasture land Ibid. p. 129, laid out to widow Rose, I Mar. 1688/89 Ibid. p. 167, 28 Nov. 1692, mentions widow Delivr'd Rose Ibid. p. 213, names Delivered Rose widow and her s o n J o h n Rose Ibid. p. 254, an Agreement of Delivered Rose widow a n d r e l ict of late husband Jonathan Rose deceased of Bra nf or d i s d ated 5 Jan. 1697/8 Ibid., p. 255, next item, Jonathan Rose, son of Deli v e r e d Rose signs that he received a portion of his esta t e , sa m e date Typescript, vol. 2, part 2, p. 344, John Rose Junr o f B r a n ford to bro. Jonathan Rose land bought of my mother Delivered R o s e , 3 0 Mar. (orNov.?) 1799; laid out to widow Rose I M a r . 16 88/ 9 etc. From the original volumes of Branford: 2:111, on 5 Jan. 1697, Delivered Rose, widow and re l i c t o f her latehusband Jonathan Rose of sd Branford d e c d t o Joh n Rose the son of the said Jonathan and Deliv er (e d? ) Rose , to son John Rose his portion of his fathe r s an d mo thers e state, with Caleb Frisbie, and Jonatha n R ose , ack.1 0 Feb. 1 697/8 2:124, Delivered Rose of Branford, widow and relic t o f J o n athan Rose late of Branford decd, deeded to so n Sam ue l Ro s e 10 Jan. 1699/ 1700 3:18, Caleb Frisbic of Branford deeds to my brothe r J o h n R ose ofBranford, right which came to me right o f m y wi f e Han nah in estate ofherhon'd father Jonathan R os e lat e o f Branf ord dec'd, ack. 24 Apr. 1710 4:153, Caleb Frisbec and wife Hannah Quit Claim la n d o f o u r fatherJonathan Rose of Branford dec'd unto Jo h n Ros e mi no r son and heir of ourbrother John Rose of B ra nfor d dec' d i n possession of his guardian Hannah Rose , d ate d 12 Feb . 171 8/9. (This latter record , establish es s om e importan t proof , including that the widow Hanna h wa s li ving at thi s time) 4:279, there was laid out to wid Rose to ye estate o f J o n a than Rosedecd, 20 acres allowed by Committee 27 J an . 17 20 121 4:382, Agreement made by proprietors of first lot of f o u r t h Divise Jonathan Linsly 15 acres; Jonathan Rose 4 7 a cr e s ; John Rose 40 acres, John Bartholomew 30 acres ; Jos hu a A ns lin? 30 acres; Joshua Fuller Richd Scarit? 30 acres, and Caleb Frisbee 30 acr e s , 3 1 O c t. 1721 4:385, the subscribers were appointed to lay out fou r t h D i vision I called out by proprietors of first lot , la i d ou t t o estate of Edward Frisdecd 152~~ acres an d to e st ate o f Jo nathan Rose, 75t~ (or 73'12) acres, da y 8 Mar . 1 719/20 4:480, subscribers were appointed to lay out fifth div i s i o n lands brushy plain quarter to estate of Jonatha n R o s e o n pitch of' Mr Rich Gould for John Roses heirs , la i d ou t 2 5 Mar. 1723 4:581, subscribers surveyed 5th division land in bru s h y p l ain divis laid out to estate of Jonathan Rose o f Br an for d d ecd, upon ye pitch Samll Rose late of sai d Branf or d dee d, 5 1 acres, dated I Feb. 1724/25 5:152, resurvey of 3rd lot 4th Division lands of Sam f l P o n d decd, He Grattwick decd, and Jonathan Rose dec d , viz , h al f ye estate of ye sd R Jonathan Roses right s i n sai d lan d i n 74 acres, dated 13 Jan. 1729/30 Children: ROSE. i. Lydia b. 20 Sept. 1671, rec. Branford VRb, predec e a s e d her father 23. ii. Hannah b. 15 Mar. 1676/77 , m . Ca l e b Frisbie 24. iii. John, eldest son, known a s Joh n Ros e J u n., m. Hannah Williams 25. iv. Samuel , m. Joa nna Ba ldw i n 26. x. (Capt.) Jonathan, m. Abig ail (Root ) Foote e ma rr ied at Plymouth, January 6 , 1634 -35. He di ed at Pl ymout h , August 23, 1655. His will wa s dated Ma y 20, 1655 , and p ro ved November 21, 1655, beq ueathing t o his wife a nd child ren , mentioning Edward on ly by name. Baptist Hicks and Mary Everard Husband Baptist Hicks ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ Born: 1520 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England ⁵ Christened: Died: 1565 - Southwark, Surrey, England ⁵ Buried: Father: Thomas Hicks (1475-1565) ³ ⁴ Mother: Margaret Atwood (1485- ) ³ ⁴ Marriage: - England Wife Mary Everard ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ AKA: Mary Everard Born: 1528 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England Christened: Died: Abt 1567 - Fortesset, Gloucester, England Buried: Father: James Everard (1509-Abt 1531) ² ³ ⁴ Mother: Noted events in her life were: • Alt. Birth ⁵, Of Fortesset, Glcstr, Eng., 1528 Children 1 M Baptist Hicks II ³ ⁴ ⁵ AKA: Baptist Hicks Born: Abt 1548 - England Christened: Died: - Y Buried: 2 M James Hicks ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ AKA: James Hicks Born: 1550 - Southwark, Surrey, London, England Christened: Died: Abt 1600 - Southwark, Surrey, England Buried: Spouse: Phebe Allyne (1547-After 1565) ² ³ ⁴ ⁵ ⁶ Marr: 1564 - London, Middlesex County, England ⁵ 3 F Mary Hicks ³ ⁴ ⁵ AKA: Mary Hicks Born: Abt 1555 Christened: Died: - Y Buried: General Notes (Husband) Sir Baptist Hicks of the third generation before Rob e r t , w as the owner ofCamden Manor in Gloucester and ha d b e e n crea ted a baronet by James I. Research Notes (Husband) [mytree.FTW] Baptist Hicks, born in 1520, married Mary Eberard, daughter of J ames, and they had two sons, Baptist, who died unmarried and James. This information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. (She has date of birth as 1528) notes available on CD-ROM #1 of Pedigree Resource File General Notes (Wife) [mytree.FTW] see Baptist Hicks Mary EVARTS or EVERARD? This information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. General Notes for Child Baptist Hicks II [mytree.FTW] This information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. Research Notes for Child James Hicks [mytree.FTW] James Hicks, son of Baptist, married Phobe Allen, daughter of Re v. Ephraim Allyn, and they were the parents of nine children, six sons and three daughters, the former of whom were: John, Ephraim, Robert, Samue l, Thomas and James. Some of this information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. notes available on CD-ROM, Disc #1 Pedigree Resource File General Notes for Child Mary Hicks [mytree.FTW] This information was downloaded from RootsWeb WorldConnect Project. It was submited by Irene Mast. If you have any questions or corrections please e-mail me at dmast@mediaone.net. Baptiste Hicks and Mary Everard Husband Baptiste Hicks Born: 1526 Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Thomas Hicks ( - ) Mother: Margaret Atwood ( - ) Marriage: Noted events in his life were: • Fact 13, Fact 13 Researcher: Michael Roy Harrington, 1996 Wife Mary Everard Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: James Everard ( - ) Mother: Noted events in her life were: • Fact 13, Fact 13 Researcher: Michael Roy Harrington, 1996 Children 1 M James Hicks Born: 1550 - Londondery, Ireland Christened: Died: Buried: Spouse: Phebe Allyne (1557- ) Michael Everard Husband Michael Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: John Everard Mother: Marian Koepsel ( -1996) Marriage: Wife (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Edison R. Sullens and Minnie Everard Husband Edison R. Sullens ⁸ Born: 30 Jan 1888 - Jefferson Co., Missouri, , , Christened: Died: 20 Dec 1944 - Jefferson Co., Missouri, , , Buried: Dec 1944 - Park Hill Cemetery, Sappington, , MO, , , Father: Darius Alvin (Al) Sullens (1840-1931) ⁸ Mother: Julia Ann Pritchett (1856-1912) ⁸ Marriage: Noted events in his life were: • Occupation, a street car conductor St. Louis, , Missouri, , , Wife Minnie Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 M Oscar Ray Sullens (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 2 F Helen Sullens (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: General Notes (Husband) SARTORI's book, p. 44 Date:1950 Nicholas Everard Husband Nicholas Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Nicholas Everard (1884-1947) Mother: Margarite Basting (1885-1974) Marriage: Wife (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Pamela Theresa Everard Husband (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Pamela Theresa Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Joseph Everard (1910-1989) ¹ Mother: Ruth Roberts Patricia Everard Husband (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Patricia Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: John Everard Mother: Marian Koepsel ( -1996) Robert James Everard Husband Robert James Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Joseph Everard (1910-1989) ¹ Mother: Ruth Roberts Marriage: Wife (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Thomas Charles Everard Husband Thomas Charles Everard Born: 22 Sep 1950 ¹ Christened: Died: 21 Mar 1976 - Manitowoc County, Wisconsin-Drowned ¹ Buried: Father: Joseph Everard (1910-1989) ¹ Mother: Ruth Roberts Marriage: Wife Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Thomas Gawdy Everard Esq. and Agnes Mannock Husband Thomas Gawdy Everard Esq. ² Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Abt 1592 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England Wife Agnes Mannock ² Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Francis Mannock (1529- ) ² Mother: Mary Fetch (1533- ) ² Children 1 F Margery Everard ² Born: Abt 1594 - Elmswell, Suffolk, England Christened: Died: Abt 1644 - Branford, New Haven, CT Buried: Spouse: Robert Rose (Abt 1594-1665) ² Marr: Abt 1618 - London, Middlesex County, England Wanda Jayne Everard Husband Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Wanda Jayne Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Joseph Everard (1910-1989) ¹ Mother: Ruth Roberts William Everard Husband William Everard (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: John Everard Mother: Marian Koepsel ( -1996) Marriage: Wife (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Raymond Gordon and Dorothy (Doris) Everdeen Husband Raymond Gordon (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: William Lyle Gordon Mother: Irene Mae Lockwood Marriage: Wife Dorothy (Doris) Everdeen (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 F Joyce Gordon (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Spouse: Henry Phister (living) 2 M William Gordon (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: 3 F Eileen Gordon (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: John Field and Elizabeth Everden Husband John Field ² Born: Abt 1645 - Providence, RI Christened: Died: 1698 Buried: Father: John Field Hon ( -1686) ² Mother: Marriage: - Providence, RI Wife Elizabeth Everden ² Born: Christened: Died: Bef 1698 Buried: Children 1 M John Field ² Born: 20 Feb 1671 - Providence, RI Christened: Died: Buried: 2 F Elizabeth Field ² Born: 17 Nov 1673 - , RI Christened: Died: Buried: 3 M Richard Field ² Born: 17 May 1677 - Providence, RI Christened: Died: 14 Sep 1725 Buried: Spouse: Susannah Waldo (1684- ) ² Marr: 17 Jan 1706 - Bridgewater, Mass 4 F Lydia Field ² Born: 9 Oct 1679 - Providence, RI Christened: Died: Buried: 5 M Daniel Field ² Born: 17 Jul 1681 - Providence, RI Christened: Died: Buried: 6 F Ruth Field ² Born: 25 Jan 1683 - , RI Christened: Died: 22 Nov 1723 Buried: 7 F Hannah Field ² Born: Christened: Died: Buried: General Notes (Husband) 1. IGI General Notes for Child Richard Field 1. IGI Arran Sibley Everest and Grace Griffin Husband Arran Sibley Everest (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Grace Griffin ² Born: Christened: Died: 1959 - Kansas City, MO Buried: Father: Charles T. Griffin (1848-1884) ² Mother: Agnes Caroline Eiler (1846-1936) ² Felix M. Wilcox and Laura Everest Husband Felix M. Wilcox (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Father: George Wilcox (1831- ) ² Mother: Mary E. Dickson ( - ) ² Marriage: Wife Laura Everest (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Children 1 F Veda Wilcox (details suppressed for this person) Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Aaron Everett II and Elsie Eveline Miller Husband Aaron Everett II ⁹ Born: 21 Jan 1800 - Perry Twp, Franklin OH Christened: Died: 21 Apr 1847 - Dublin Franklin Co, OH Buried: - Davis Cem-Rivers, Near Dublin Brid, OH. Father: Samuel Everett Sr (Abt 1773-1848) ¹⁰ Mother: Sarah Wilcox (1774-1817) ¹¹ Marriage: 15 May 1827 - Perry Twp, Franklin Co. Or Pickaway Co, OH. Wife Elsie Eveline Miller ¹² Born: Abt 1800 Christened: Died: Buried: John Winne Schermerhorn and Abigail Everett Husband John Winne Schermerhorn ² Born: Christened: 4 Jul 1747 Died: 5 Jan 1817 Buried: Father: Cornelis Jacob Schermerhorn ( - ) ² Mother: Maria Winne ( - ) ² Marriage: 10 Nov 1793 - , NY Other Spouse: Catalyntie Van Valkenburg (1744-1793) ² - 5 Dec 1775 - Rdc, Kinderhook, Columbia County, NY Wife Abigail Everett ² Born: Christened: Died: Buried: General Notes (Husband) BIRTH & BAPTISM: no proven record MARRIAGE: 1st; C h u r c h record 2nd; no proven record Addie M. Everitt\ Everett Husband Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Addie M. Everitt\ Everett ¹³ Born: Sep 1891 - KS Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Thomas H Everitt\ Everett (1864-1932) ¹⁴ Mother: Amy S. Everitt\ Everett (1868-1938) ¹³ Agnes C. Everitt\ Everett Husband Born: Christened: Died: Buried: Marriage: Wife Agnes C. Everitt\ Everett ¹³* Born: 18 Mar 1895 - KS Christened: Died: Buried: Father: Oscar Buren Everitt\ Everett (1871-1929) ¹⁴ Mother: Carrie Elnora Dillon (1874-1956) Sources 1 June Spurgeon-Oct 1997. 2 J. Feagin, Gedcom from J. Feagin. 3 The Church of Jesus Christ of Latter-day Saints, Ancestral File (TM) (June 1998 (c), data as of 5 JAN 1998 Repository: Family History Library 35 N West Temple Street Salt Lake City, UT 84150 USA ABBR Ancestral File (TM)). 4 Pedigree Resource File CD 1 (Salt Lake City, UT: Intellectual Reserve, Inc., 1999) ABBR Pedigree Resource File CD 1. 5 af18.ged (GEDCOM file obtained from Genealogy Online, Santa Cruz, California. File "af18.ged" / http://emcee.com , obtained 1/28/96. Original author unknown.) 6 Pedigree Resource File CD 2 (Salt Lake City, UT: Intellectual Reserve, Inc., 1999) ABBR Pedigree Resource File CD 2. 7 L. David Roper, Rousper.ged by L. David Roper. 8 Michael S. Cole MD, Michael S. Cole MD (7410 Oxford Pl. Fort Smith, AR 72903-4232). 9 Also Leland Adams 'Everitt.GED' @T3282@. 10 Leland Adams 'Everitt.GED' @T2296@. 11 Leland Adams 'Everrit.GED' @T2299@. 12 Also Leland Adams 'Everitt.GED' @T3283@ He also has marriage inPickaway Co, OH.. 13 3.Leland Adams 'Everitt.GED'. 14 Leland Adams 'Everitt.GED '.

View our sister site at ancientancestors.net

Creative Commons License

This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-Noncommercial-Share Alike 2.5 License.

Some of our Favorite Genealogy Links
Maximilian Genealogy	Free Searchable Databases-Royals-Famous-Historic-Your Family?